東華大學圖書館 |

Language: English

Help

回圖書館首頁

手機版館藏查詢

Back

Switch To: Labeled | MARC Mode | ISBD

How philosophers argue = an adversar...

Leal, Fernando.

Linked to FindBook

Google Book

Amazon

博客來

How philosophers argue = an adversarial collaboration on the Russell-Copleston debate /

Record Type:	Electronic resources : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	How philosophers argue/ by Fernando Leal, Hubert Marraud.
Reminder of title:	an adversarial collaboration on the Russell-Copleston debate /
Author:	Leal, Fernando.
other author:	Marraud, Hubert.
Published:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2022.,
Description:	xiii, 472 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm.
[NT 15003449]:	Preface -- Introduction -- Chapter 1. Argumentation Theories -- Part I: A P-Theoretical Analysis of the Debate, by Fernando Leal -- Chapter 2. Description of the Method Followed -- Chapter 3. Analysis of Segment I: Start of the Debate -- Chapter 4. Analysis of Segment II: Discussion of Copleston's Metaphysical Argument -- Chapter 5. Analysis of Segment III: Discussion of Copleston's Religious Argument -- Chapter 6. Analysis of Segment IV: Discussion of Copleston's Moral Argument -- Chapter 7. Analysis of Segment V: Summing-Up of the Arguments -- Part II: An E-Theoretical Analysis of the Debate, by Hubert Marraud -- Chapter 8. Argument Dialectic -- Chapter 9. Argumentation Structures and Operations -- Chapter 10. Counterarguments -- Chapter 11. Co-oriented Reasons and Modifiers -- Chapter 12. Intertwined Structures -- Chapter 13. An Argument-Dialectical Analysis of the Russell-Copleston Debate -- Chapter 14. An Exercise in Adversarial Collaboration -- Appendix: Text of the Russell-Copleston Debate.
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Logic. -
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85368-6
ISBN:	9783030853686

How philosophers argue = an adversarial collaboration on the Russell-Copleston debate /
Leal, Fernando.

How philosophers arguean adversarial collaboration on the Russell-Copleston debate /[electronic resource] :by Fernando Leal, Hubert Marraud. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2022. - xiii, 472 p. :ill., digital ;24 cm. - Argumentation library,v. 412215-1907 ;. - Argumentation library ;v. 41..

Preface -- Introduction -- Chapter 1. Argumentation Theories -- Part I: A P-Theoretical Analysis of the Debate, by Fernando Leal -- Chapter 2. Description of the Method Followed -- Chapter 3. Analysis of Segment I: Start of the Debate -- Chapter 4. Analysis of Segment II: Discussion of Copleston's Metaphysical Argument -- Chapter 5. Analysis of Segment III: Discussion of Copleston's Religious Argument -- Chapter 6. Analysis of Segment IV: Discussion of Copleston's Moral Argument -- Chapter 7. Analysis of Segment V: Summing-Up of the Arguments -- Part II: An E-Theoretical Analysis of the Debate, by Hubert Marraud -- Chapter 8. Argument Dialectic -- Chapter 9. Argumentation Structures and Operations -- Chapter 10. Counterarguments -- Chapter 11. Co-oriented Reasons and Modifiers -- Chapter 12. Intertwined Structures -- Chapter 13. An Argument-Dialectical Analysis of the Russell-Copleston Debate -- Chapter 14. An Exercise in Adversarial Collaboration -- Appendix: Text of the Russell-Copleston Debate.

This volume presents a double argumentative analysis of the debate between Bertrand Russell and Frederick Copleston on the existence of God. It includes an introduction justifying the choice of text and describing the historical and philosophical background of the debate. It also provides a transcript of the debate, based in part on the original recording. The argumentative analyses occupy Parts I and II of the book. In Part I the argumentative process is analysed by means of the ideal model of critical discussion, the workhorse of pragma-dialectics. Part I shows how the two parties go through the four stages of a critical discussion. It highlights the questions raised over and beyond the presiding question of whether God exists and examines almost a hundred questions that are raised. Many are left in the air, whereas a few others give rise to sundry sub-discussions or meta-dialogues. In Part II the theoretical framework of argument dialectic is put to work: argument structures are identified by means of punctuation marks, argumentative connectors and operators, allowing to see the argumentative exchange as the collaborative construction of a macro-argument. Such a macro-argument is both a joint product of the arguers and a complex structure representing the dialectical relationships between the individual arguments combined in it. Finally, the complementarity of the two approaches is addressed. Thus the book can be described as an exercise in adversarial collaboration.

ISBN: 9783030853686

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-85368-6doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

529544
Logic.

LC Class. No.: BC108

Dewey Class. No.: 160

How philosophers argue = an adversarial collaboration on the Russell-Copleston debate /
LDR:03575nmm a2200337 a 4500 001 2299441
003 DE-He213
005 20220221071818.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 230324s2022 sz s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783030853686 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783030853679 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-85368-6 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-85368-6
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a BC108
072 7 $a HPC $2 bicssc
072 7 $a PHI009000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a QDH $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 160 $2 23
090 $a BC108 $b .L435 2022
100 1 $a Leal, Fernando. $3 3596887
245 1 0 $a How philosophers argue $h [electronic resource] : $b an adversarial collaboration on the Russell-Copleston debate / $c by Fernando Leal, Hubert Marraud.
260 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2022.
300 $a xiii, 472 p. : $b ill., digital ; $c 24 cm.
490 1 $a Argumentation library, $x 2215-1907 ; $v v. 41
505 0 $a Preface -- Introduction -- Chapter 1. Argumentation Theories -- Part I: A P-Theoretical Analysis of the Debate, by Fernando Leal -- Chapter 2. Description of the Method Followed -- Chapter 3. Analysis of Segment I: Start of the Debate -- Chapter 4. Analysis of Segment II: Discussion of Copleston's Metaphysical Argument -- Chapter 5. Analysis of Segment III: Discussion of Copleston's Religious Argument -- Chapter 6. Analysis of Segment IV: Discussion of Copleston's Moral Argument -- Chapter 7. Analysis of Segment V: Summing-Up of the Arguments -- Part II: An E-Theoretical Analysis of the Debate, by Hubert Marraud -- Chapter 8. Argument Dialectic -- Chapter 9. Argumentation Structures and Operations -- Chapter 10. Counterarguments -- Chapter 11. Co-oriented Reasons and Modifiers -- Chapter 12. Intertwined Structures -- Chapter 13. An Argument-Dialectical Analysis of the Russell-Copleston Debate -- Chapter 14. An Exercise in Adversarial Collaboration -- Appendix: Text of the Russell-Copleston Debate.
520 $a This volume presents a double argumentative analysis of the debate between Bertrand Russell and Frederick Copleston on the existence of God. It includes an introduction justifying the choice of text and describing the historical and philosophical background of the debate. It also provides a transcript of the debate, based in part on the original recording. The argumentative analyses occupy Parts I and II of the book. In Part I the argumentative process is analysed by means of the ideal model of critical discussion, the workhorse of pragma-dialectics. Part I shows how the two parties go through the four stages of a critical discussion. It highlights the questions raised over and beyond the presiding question of whether God exists and examines almost a hundred questions that are raised. Many are left in the air, whereas a few others give rise to sundry sub-discussions or meta-dialogues. In Part II the theoretical framework of argument dialectic is put to work: argument structures are identified by means of punctuation marks, argumentative connectors and operators, allowing to see the argumentative exchange as the collaborative construction of a macro-argument. Such a macro-argument is both a joint product of the arguers and a complex structure representing the dialectical relationships between the individual arguments combined in it. Finally, the complementarity of the two approaches is addressed. Thus the book can be described as an exercise in adversarial collaboration.
650 0 $a Logic. $3 529544
650 0 $a Reasoning. $3 519507
650 1 4 $a History of Philosophy. $3 896985
700 1 $a Marraud, Hubert. $3 3596888
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 836513
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
830 0 $a Argumentation library ; $v v. 41. $3 3596889
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85368-6
950 $a Religion and Philosophy (SpringerNature-41175)