東華大學圖書館 |

How Appropriate Is the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (Pacic) as a Measure of Patient Experience Among Individuals with Chronic Pain? a Rasch Based Analysis.

紀錄類型:	書目-電子資源 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	How Appropriate Is the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (Pacic) as a Measure of Patient Experience Among Individuals with Chronic Pain? a Rasch Based Analysis./
作者:	Modi, Maitri.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2021,
面頁冊數:	77 p.
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International83-03.
標題:	Health care access. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28731109
ISBN:	9798544223672

How Appropriate Is the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (Pacic) as a Measure of Patient Experience Among Individuals with Chronic Pain? a Rasch Based Analysis.
Modi, Maitri.

How Appropriate Is the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (Pacic) as a Measure of Patient Experience Among Individuals with Chronic Pain? a Rasch Based Analysis. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2021 - 77 p.

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03.

Thesis (M.S.)--McGill University (Canada), 2021.

This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.

Background: Measuring patient-centred care is an essential element of health services performance assessment and quality improvement. The Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) questionnaire is one of the most widely used measures to evaluate patient-centred care in clinical practice and research. However, the PACIC was not validated in the chronic pain population, and there have been conflicting findings regarding its psychometric properties for other chronic conditions. We aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the PACIC among individuals with chronic pain. This study's objective was to assess the extent to which the PACIC items measure a single construct and fit an underlying theoretical hierarchy that forms a linear continuum with interval-like properties in patients with chronic pain.Methods: Available cross-sectional PACIC data were used from an adult study sample with low back pain (LBP; N=270) to assess unidimensionality, local independence, item fit, person fit, item hierarchy, scale targeting and precision ,person reliability.Results: The initial analysis demonstrated the PACIC data did not fit the Rasch model. Accordingly, modifications were made, including rescoring items and removing items and persons with poor fit. The final model contained 12 items that had a satisfactory fit to the Rasch model. Support for unidimensionality was demonstrated through principal component analysis and confidence intervals.Conclusion: The present study has shown that the 12 items PACIC version, as applied to the chronic pain population, satisfies Rasch model expectations and the unidimensionality assumptions, having accommodated local dependency issues. Further testing of these 12 items is needed to generate further evidence for the content validity of the 12 item PACIC in a LBP population.

ISBN: 9798544223672Subjects--Topical Terms:

3541397
Health care access.

How Appropriate Is the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (Pacic) as a Measure of Patient Experience Among Individuals with Chronic Pain? a Rasch Based Analysis.
LDR:05424nmm a2200421 4500 001 2346674
005 20220620110713.5
008 241004s2021 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9798544223672
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28731109
035 $a (MiAaPQ)McGill_n009w7081
035 $a AAI28731109
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Modi, Maitri. $3 3685840
245 1 0 $a How Appropriate Is the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (Pacic) as a Measure of Patient Experience Among Individuals with Chronic Pain? a Rasch Based Analysis.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2021
300 $a 77 p.
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-03.
500 $a Advisor: Ahmed, Sara.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--McGill University (Canada), 2021.
506 $a This item must not be sold to any third party vendors.
520 $a Background: Measuring patient-centred care is an essential element of health services performance assessment and quality improvement. The Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) questionnaire is one of the most widely used measures to evaluate patient-centred care in clinical practice and research. However, the PACIC was not validated in the chronic pain population, and there have been conflicting findings regarding its psychometric properties for other chronic conditions. We aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the PACIC among individuals with chronic pain. This study's objective was to assess the extent to which the PACIC items measure a single construct and fit an underlying theoretical hierarchy that forms a linear continuum with interval-like properties in patients with chronic pain.Methods: Available cross-sectional PACIC data were used from an adult study sample with low back pain (LBP; N=270) to assess unidimensionality, local independence, item fit, person fit, item hierarchy, scale targeting and precision ,person reliability.Results: The initial analysis demonstrated the PACIC data did not fit the Rasch model. Accordingly, modifications were made, including rescoring items and removing items and persons with poor fit. The final model contained 12 items that had a satisfactory fit to the Rasch model. Support for unidimensionality was demonstrated through principal component analysis and confidence intervals.Conclusion: The present study has shown that the 12 items PACIC version, as applied to the chronic pain population, satisfies Rasch model expectations and the unidimensionality assumptions, having accommodated local dependency issues. Further testing of these 12 items is needed to generate further evidence for the content validity of the 12 item PACIC in a LBP population.
520 $a Contexte: La mesure des soins centres sur le patient dans les services de sante est un element essentiel de l'evaluation du rendement et de l'amelioration des services lors de l'etablissement de rapports sur la qualite des soins et de la definition de la politique de sante. Le questionnaire d'evaluation des soins aux patients atteints de maladies chroniques (PACIC) est l'une des meilleures mesures pour evaluer les soins axes sur le patient dans la pratique clinique et la recherche. Cependant, le PACIC n'a pas ete valide dans la population de la douleur chronique, et il y a eu des resultats contradictoires concernant ses proprietes psychometriques pour d'autres conditions chroniques. Nous visions a evaluer les proprietes psychometriques de la PACIC chez les personnes souffrant de douleur chronique. L'objectif de cette etude etait d'evaluer dans quelle mesure les items du PACIC mesurent un seul construit et correspondent a une hierarchie theorique sous-jacente qui forme un continuum lineaire avec des proprietes de type intervalle chez les patients souffrant de douleur chronique.Methodes: Les donnees transversales disponibles de la PACIC ont ete utilisees a partir d'echantillons d'adultes souffrant de lombalgie (N = 270) pour evaluer l'unidimensionnalite, l'independance locale, l'ajustement de l'item, l'ajustement de la personne, la hierarchie des items, le ciblage et la precision de l'echelle (fiabilite et separation des personnes).Resultats: L'analyse initiale a demontre que les donnees ne correspondaient pas au modele de Rasch. En consequence, des modifications ont ete apportees, notamment la reevaluation des elements et le retrait des elements et des personnes mal ajustees. Le modele final contenait 12 elements qui avaient un ajustement satisfaisant au modele Rasch. La prise en charge de l'unidimensionnalite a ete demontree par l'analyse en composantes principales et les intervalles de confiance. Conclusion: La presente etude a montre que la version PACIC a 12 items, telle qu'appliquee a la population de douleur chronique, satisfait les attentes du modele de Rasch et les hypotheses d'unidimensionnalite, ayant pris en compte les problemes de dependance locale. Ces 12 elements doivent faire l'objet d'une validation de contenu pour renforcer davantage les resultats de cette etude.
590 $a School code: 0781.
650 4 $a Health care access. $3 3541397
650 4 $a Population. $3 518693
650 4 $a Pain management. $3 3562647
650 4 $a Collaboration. $3 3556296
650 4 $a Clinical medicine. $3 804916
650 4 $a Health care policy. $3 3550686
650 4 $a Communication. $3 524709
650 4 $a Medical personnel. $2 itrt. $3 774747
650 4 $a Chronic illnesses. $3 3550688
650 4 $a Narcotics. $3 754737
650 4 $a Disease management. $3 3232333
650 4 $a Back pain. $3 3563101
650 4 $a Society. $3 700566
650 4 $a Primary care. $3 3681757
650 4 $a Public health. $3 534748
650 4 $a Design. $3 518875
650 4 $a Alternative medicine. $3 536195
650 4 $a Health services. $3 959271
650 4 $a Education. $3 516579
650 4 $a Medicine. $3 641104
650 4 $a Pharmaceutical sciences. $3 3173021
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 532803
650 4 $a Research. $3 531893
650 4 $a Values. $3 518648
650 4 $a Books. $3 641578
650 4 $a Manuscripts. $3 3566242
690 $a 0496
690 $a 0573
690 $a 0389
690 $a 0207
690 $a 0459
690 $a 0515
690 $a 0454
690 $a 0564
690 $a 0572
690 $a 0630
710 2 $a McGill University (Canada). $3 1018122
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 83-03.
790 $a 0781
791 $a M.S.
792 $a 2021
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28731109